
Silent Barrage is an robotic installation produced by SymbioticA, The Centre of Excellence in Biological Arts at The School of Anatomy & Human Biology, University of Western Australia. The work aims to connect visitors to cultured nerve cells through an architectural/sculptural context, allowing users to connect and ‘see’ microscopic worlds and in turn those microscopic worlds to have an influence within our macroscopic world.
Each pole in the arrangement represents a region in the culture dish, and the movements of the individual robots correspond to the level of activity in the area. The robots markings on the poles hint to the continuous neuronal activity, conjuring traces of “memories” of past actions. The movement of audience in the Silent Barrage’s space is used to stimulate the culture. Nerve cells activity usually happens when a certain combination of stimulations reaches a threshold; the same can be said about our decision making. The navigation through Silent Barrage is made out of a series of incremental decisions made in an overly stimulated environment, out of the context of daily life. The nerve cells are also out of context, removed from the brain they once belong to, they are cultured in an artificial environment, trying to make connections with the cells around them. The barrage of activity is a symptom, can pairing cells and the audience can help make “meaningful” connections that will quieten the barrage? Can it happen in a place which is nothing but quiet?
While clearly an ambitious and admirable work, it does make some dubious claims such as being “One of the very few real art and science works” when there are quite a few spanning various combinations of the arts and sciences (in this area alone Edwardo Kac and Ken Rinaldo have been prolifically producing work for years).
Originally seen at VVork.
2 Comments / Pings about “Silent Barrage” »
Leave a comment


January 29th, 2010 at 6:28 am
The claim is NOT that there are no other examples of works that engage with Art and Science. Silent Barrage was developed in SymbioticA – a research lab that hosted hundreds Art & Science projects … so we are obviously aware of the growing body of work in the filed.
The claim was that it is one of the only true collaborations between artists and scientists where the scientists are Not only assisting the artists (like in the case of Kac and many other artists). Dr. Steve Potter is very interested in the data that is collected at the end of every exhibition. and to some extent using it for his own research. There were 2-3 scientific papers that were written about the project from a science point of view and not the culture aspects of it.
If you read the text careful you will see that this is the claim – very different to the way you understood it.
Comment by Guy Ben-Ary — January 29, 2010 @ 6:28 am
January 29th, 2010 at 1:16 pm
I understood that the comment was from a scientific point of view as opposed to a cultural point of view. Perhaps Edwardo Kac and Ken Rinaldo are not the best examples within this context but there are still notable examples of this type of collaboration in the past.
You should note that this weblog is from a cultural point of view more than anything else and while my comment may have been critical I would not have written about this work unless I thought it was valid and interesting within the weblogs context.
Comment by Garrett — January 29, 2010 @ 1:16 pm